Author Haruki Murakami says nationalism over Japan-China dispute is like ‘cheap liquor’

Author Haruki Murakami says nationalism over Japan-China dispute is like ‘cheap liquor’

Internationally renown Japanese author Haruki Murakami has shared his point of view on the China-Japan territorial dispute over the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands. As Beijing and Tokyo continue to argue at the U.N. General Assembly in New York, Murakami shows he has the same feelings as the rest of us with level heads; that the nationalism spewed by politicians in nothing more than cheap liquor. The author of best-sellers Norwegian Wood, The Wind-up Bird Chronicle, and Kafka on the Shore spoke out through an editorial in Japan’s Asahi Shimbun newspaper.

Murakami feels that territorial disputes are an inescapable consequence of dividing humanity in countries with national borders. He says that disputes over land stop being a practical issue when they are viewed through “nationalist sentiment,’ and become dangerous situations with no exit. That national sentiment is just like cheap liquor, he explains, it gets you drunk quickly, act hysterical, say things loudly you normally wouldn’t say, and act in ways you wouldn’t normally act. And in the end you are just left with a headache and the mess you created the next morning. This “drunken hysteria” over the uninhabited islands in the East China Sea isn’t even over yet, and I think majority of both Japanese a Chinese already have headaches.

While Japan has controlled the islands for decades now, calling them the Senkaku, China has also laid claims to the territory it refers to as Diaoyu. Japan’s recent purchase of the islands from their private owners has enraged China, which feels the act is an attack on their sovereignty. Just over a week ago, China was overrun with anti-Japanese sentiment, resulting in sometimes violent protests and demonstrations involving the destruction of Japanese property and the burning of Japanese flags.

Murakami closed his argument against nationalism, and cheap liquor, by saying that politicians and critics who lavish the people with it should be avoided. A wise idea, but too bad Shinzo Abe, the most nationalist candidate, was just elected as leader of the opposing Liberal Democratic Party. Murakami has earned commercial and critical success with readers around the world, and also enjoys a strong following in Asian countries like China, South Korea and Taiwan.

[via New Straits Times]
Share Button
DISCUSS IT
Comment Policy : Our comments section is open and welcome to anyone who wishes to participate in discussion or share their point of view, regardless of what it may be. In order to limit spam and those who wish to impede meaningful conversation, we are now requiring users to log in with an account or verify their email address. However, the following behavior will result in your comment being deleted or, if continued, permanent removal from conversations: posting under multiple names, making hateful/racist comments, or making no valuable contribution by posting the same thing repeatedly.
  • Ateccorpca@gmail.com

    Did China respect the international law of territorial dispute when asking Japan to respect that law? Look at Tibet and Mognolia. Look at Vietnam’s islands got stollen by Chinese force. China is a lawless country and can’t ask any one respect the law against them. Go Japan, beat the shit out of ths devil China.

    • sdfqef

      Even Japan is not dumb as you are to “Beat” their bankers and business partners. You must be Vietnamese.

      • JL

        You must be chinese, china is like a big bully kid crying wolf when it does get what it want. It does not matter anymore at this point, every country in Asia must arm themselves to protect their countries from a bully.

        • Guest

          And Japan has never bullied other countries before? Last time I checked it was Japan that invaded and massacred millions of innocent civilians NOT China. Please go back to kindergarden and learn history!

          • Donald

            Last time I looked no one in control of any part of Japanese society had any part in Japan invading and killing anyone. Not a single person. How do you blame people who weren’t even born? It’s simple-minded and unique to China. Most of the Israeli people don’t blame the current German government or it’s people for killing 6 MILLION Jews.Why do most Chinese?

          • bombkiller007

            China (both Nationalist under Chiang and Communist under Mao) have killed an estimated 60 to 70 million people. The largest genocide in history. And this was against their own people in various social and economic movements (the so called Cultural Revolution for one, with Maoist Youth killing and tourturing millions of innocents across China).

            China also massacred Tibetans, Falun Gong, Uigyars, etc. China measure for measure has the most blood on her hands than any other nation in the world. And her fascist aggression against her neighbors is not confined to Japan. You and I both know that is just propaganda for the uninformed.

            To resolve issues, we need to look past the jingoistic propaganda and get to the heart of the issues. Massive resources in the disputed island areas, and a disintegrating Chinese society that looks like a future Balkans and a government desperate to prevent that by creating a foreign boogeyman.

          • OCS

            It’s good you brought up Chiang and Mao killing their own people. Did you Chinese people already forget? Chiang Kai Shek partnered with Hitler in 1930s until 1941 when Nazi Germany signed a pact with Japan against Soviet Union. During those times, ROC China (then mainland, now Taiwan) partnered with the worse evil in the history of mankind. What do you say to Chinese now? I bet this pact with Hitler is not widely taught in schools… It’s a total humiliation for Chinese and Taiwanese that they sold their soul to the devil at one point.
            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-German_cooperation_until_1941

            Chiang’s adopted son was even trained by Hitler’s Army. What do you say about things like that?

        • sdfqef

          Educated yourself. Only only needs to look at history to see who has been bullying who.

    • Shuami

      For someone who left his e-mail address for the world to see, your level of intelligence is obviously questionable. And the rhetoric in your posting confirms that.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000405903680 Garo Ungaro

    let the united nation take over the island in dispute and all small islands in the china sea from south korea japan the philippines …and back by US military as the monitoring forces…until there is proper agreement reach upon by the international court. all territories outside 200 miles limit shall be under UN…

    • sdfqef

      Will never happen. It doesn’t require a political science major to realize the US is not neutral and will never be.

      • Shuami

        You have the prime example of how NOT to resolve dispute over land in the age-old conflict between Israel and Palestine when one of the supposedly “neutral” brokers is obviously siding with one of the parties. There needs to be a higher order of authority to resolve sovereignty issues, especially historical ones. Unfortunately that higher order is not the UN, and certainly not the US. Until now history has shown that these disputes are resolved via force or power.
        But that is not to say that we can’t give peace a chance, when both are, and especially one of them is, willing to compromise. For example, China has in the past decades resolved border issues with several neighbouring countries. It has recently (2011) settled its border dispute with Tajikistan, receiving roughly only 3.5% of the 28,000 square kilometers of land it laid claim to. Also under its border agreements with Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, China received just 22% and 32% respectively of the land disputed with these countries.
        See article “China plays long game on border disputes” on Asia Times online (www dot atimes dot com)

        • Shuami

          Here’s the URL for the article “”China plays long game on border disputes” I mentioned in my earlier posting:
          http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/MA27Ad02.html
          I wasn’t sure if this site allows URL in their user forum postings or not.

  • sdfqef

    Too bad this author wasn’t here in the early 1900s when Japan slaughtered half of Asia.

    • Dove

      Please provide population data to back this up. For example: The Nanking issue has been disproven (International Committee noted 200,000 pre December census, and a 210,000 census in March….so 10,000 Chinese moved INTO Nanking….).

      If there are other Asian nations that were depopulated to the tune of 50% as you say, where were they?

      Again by example (and to save you some time) Korea had the following:

      1910 1.31 Million *Annexed by Japan*
      1915 1.59 Million
      1920 1.68 Million
      1925 1.80 Million
      1930 1.92 Million
      1935 2.08 Million
      1940 2.29 Million
      1945 2.22 *Last year of Japanese administration*

      So Korea had a steady increase. Not a 50% decrease at any point due to “slaughter”. Which nations were you mentioning?

  • k8

    No matter who is in the right, the fact is, Japan has alienated every ally in the region. Of course, Japan thinks big brother America will come to save them, but don’t forget that China has the ability to inflict a lot of economic damage on America. They’re not going to act rashly in this situation, especially with how thinly spread out their military is at this time.

    • j

      From what I see, Japan is so confident with their argument that they don’t even need help of the U.S., really.

  • RW

    Respect the American approach.
    The Americans does not recognize the islands as Japanese territory. A solution should be negotiated between Japan and China.
    On the other hand the US is very clear about the use of force.
    US states that the Islands are under the defense treaty with Japan which means It will side with Japan in case of violence.

  • Goethe

    Another case of greed. Murakamis books were pulled from Chinese shelves on September 25. His Chinese agent could not get them put back up, and feeling economic loss, he makes a statement that is arguably pro Chinese. Contrast this to his “Egg” speech he made at the Jerusalem Literary Award about the individual humans being a fragile egg, and the system being evil. There is no system that dehumanizes more than Communism, and the Chinese system dehumanizes millions. Yet far from being true to a value statement, he wants the Yuan in his pocket and greed trumps values for Haruki-chan.

    • J

      I’m pretty sure he’s rich enough by now if you look at the number of books he’s selling all over the world. It’s easy to imagine the temporary lack of sales in China (or even it became permanent) wouldn’t be an issue for him. And I’m not sure how you interpreted the article as a pro-communist statement. Even compared to the egg speech, he’s consistent in the sense that he’s against violence.

    • J

      I’m pretty sure he’s rich enough by now if you look at the number of books he’s selling all over the world. It’s easy to imagine the temporary lack of sales in China (or even it became permanent) wouldn’t be an issue for him. And how did you interpreted the article as pro-communist statement? Even compared to the egg speech, he’s consistent in the sense that he’s against violence.