China claims evidence of Japan’s close-range surveillance over navy

China claims evidence of Japan’s close-range surveillance over navy

According to the Chinese government-backed Xinhua news agency, a spokesman for the country’s military has stated that they have “adequate” evidence of Japanese warships and aircrafts engaging in close-range “monitoring and surveillance” over China’s navy. Geng Yansheng, with the Ministry of National Defense, said that China retains its right to take “relevant measures.” There was no mention of the fact that Japan may be carrying out the monitoring because China’s military ships were found to have used weapons-targeting radar in January.

It should not take much to realize that this accusation is an exact tit-for-tat claim against the Tokyo government’s announcement in February that it had evidence of China’s radar usage in the waters near the disputed Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands. Geng says that for some time Japanese military ships and airplanes have followed, monitored, and disturbed Chinese naval vessels, something which “aggravates current Sino-Japanese marine security problems.” A very astute observation from Geng, and one that completely legitimizes and explains why Japan would be so upset about radar being pointed at its own military. But just as the Chinese Defense Ministry stated last month, Geng maintains that facts make it clear Japan’s allegations are groundless.

The government spokesman went on to say that Japan was motivated to “tarnish the image of Chinese military,” and misled the international community’s opinion in order to create regional tension. Geng added that the international community should be paying attention to Japan’s actions and its leader’s continued hyping of the Chinese threat by prompting military confrontation. He concluded his propagandist message by stating that Japan needed to mind its words and actions, stop repeating its mistaken messages, and handle the territorial dispute “properly.”

[via People's Daily]
Share Button
DISCUSS IT
Comment Policy : Our comments section is open and welcome to anyone who wishes to participate in discussion or share their point of view, regardless of what it may be. In order to limit spam and those who wish to impede meaningful conversation, we are now requiring users to log in with an account or verify their email address. However, the following behavior will result in your comment being deleted or, if continued, permanent removal from conversations: posting under multiple names, making hateful/racist comments, or making no valuable contribution by posting the same thing repeatedly.
  • Far East

    Yes, the Chinese government problem runs much deeper actually. Their problem is that nobody in the world believes them.
    As rightfully quoted by the Financial Times today:
    “Nobody [in the region] believes in the peaceful rise of China anymore,” said the head of
    one local bank in Hong Kong.
    http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/0df9d2c8-81d9-11e2-ae78-00144feabdc0.html

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ryszard-Ewiak/100001202215731 Ryszard Ewiak

    Where are we going? The Bible says: “And [the king of the north] will go back (to) his land with great wealth [1945. This detail indicated that Hitler will attack the Soviet Union, and that he will fight to the bitter end]; and his heart (will be) against the holy covenant [hostility towards Christians]; and will act [it means activity in the international arena]; and turned back to his own land [1991-1993. The collapse of the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact. Russian troops returned to their country]. At the appointed time [he] will return back.” (Daniel 11:28, 29a, literal translation) The return of Russia in this context means crisis, which will eclipse the Great Depression. Not only the eurozone will break up, but also the European Union and NATO. Then many countries of the former Eastern block will return to Russia’s zone of influence. Russian troops will be stationed here again.

    Russia, however, will not return everywhere. “And [the king of the north] will enter into the south [Georgia], but it will not be as the former [1921] or as the latter [2008], for the dwellers of coastlands of Kittim [the West] will come against him, and he will be dejected, and will go back.” (Daniel 11:29b, 30a, literal translation)

    Moses writes: “But ships from the direction of Kittim [from the West], and troubling Asshur [Russia] and troubling Eber [remaining enemies, including Iran and China].” (Numbers 24:24a, literal translation)

    This will be a nuclear war. (Revelation 6:4) “A great sword” = a nuclear sword. As Jesus foretold, it will be “the beginning of birth pains”. (Mathew 24:7, 8)

    All the details of this vision are being fulfilled from the time of ancient Persia, in chronological order. It is true that this vision is variously interpreted. As one can see, it has a lot of details. Therefore the insightful person is able to detect any error or sophistry. (Daniel 12:10)

    In 1882 British troops occupied Egypt. Great Britain then took the role of “the king of the south”. Around the same time, Russia expanded its influence in the region, which previously belonged to Seleucus I Nicator, and took the role of “the king of the north”. (Daniel 11:27)

  • Tran-VN

    I don’t believe it. CN seems love to copy anything from the West, US or JP: domestic, military, security….The Bejing restaurant with an offensive sign (even no one could confirm if this offensive sign was put up by English), CN never blamed the US for cyber attacked or JP until after those two countries published what they found or done by CN. Yes, just another copies.