Death penalty given to murderer with single victim and no criminal record

Death penalty given to murderer with single victim and no criminal record

An Okayama district court sentenced 30-year old Koichi Sumida to death for killing a 27-year old woman in September 2011. This is the first death sentence in which there was only one victim and the accused has no previously recorded crimes. Sumida’s lawyer immediately filed an appeal on the same day.

Sumida was charged with the crimes of robbery, rape, murder and damaging and abandoning a body. He had previously admitted to committing the crimes and said that he felt no pity for his victim. In a most recent hearing, however, he was in tears as he sought for the forgiveness of the victim’s family. The ruling confirmed that his victim, Misa Kato, was in fact a colleague. He robbed her first prior to sexually assaulting her and stabbing her to death. He then dismembered her body and abandoned it in Osaka.

Sumida is the 16th recipient of a death penalty from a judging panel which included private citizens—a system introduced in May 2009. Judge Morioka, who presided over the panel of professional and lay judges hearing the case, highlighted that the motive was to “work off sexual frustration” and “there is little likelihood of rehabilitation.” He said Sumida’s lack of criminal record was an inappropriate consideration to lessen the penalty where “the defendant’s inclination toward committing a crime cannot be ruled out.”

Share Button
DISCUSS IT
Comment Policy : Our comments section is open and welcome to anyone who wishes to participate in discussion or share their point of view, regardless of what it may be. In order to limit spam and those who wish to impede meaningful conversation, we are now requiring users to log in with an account or verify their email address. However, the following behavior will result in your comment being deleted or, if continued, permanent removal from conversations: posting under multiple names, making hateful/racist comments, or making no valuable contribution by posting the same thing repeatedly.
  • Fendy

    Good judgement. If he believes it’s ok to kill if one is not caught, then he deserves the death penalty. Regarding the mentally unstable person in Guam who killed members of a Japanese family who went there for a marriage ceremony – he should have got the death penalty in Guam because he intentionally killed more than one person including the 28-year old mother holding a baby.

  • Truth

    I have no idea why the bleeding heart liberals make such a thing about the death sentence.

    Theft, rape, murder and dismemberment of a vulnerable woman … and then they want to let him off in x years and for us to pay for his comfort and imprisonment until then … why?

    If the bleeding heart liberals want to pay for his lifetime incarceration with their own money then, OK, may be. But they don’t. They want to pay with our money, and money which could be far better spent protecting women and children from monsters like this.

    It’s insane. A family loses a daughter horrendously and they get nothing. The murderer gets rewarded.

    Who’s going to be there for the mother when she gets old now? Certainly not the liberals.

    The English speaking world picks on this issue as a way of reinforcing a negative stereotype on Japan, of it being cruel of backward. Personally, I think it is wonderful that it still has, and uses, the death sentence. And that it needs it. All societies need it not as an “ultimate deterrent” but merely as a way saving money rather keeping garbage alive.

    I’d be happy if all rapists, never mind murders, were given the death sentence. Perhaps if they started to do so, more men would get the message sexual crimes again women are unacceptable.