Gay marriage debate: Japan next, hope equal rights activists

Gay marriage debate: Japan next, hope equal rights activists

While gay marriage is becoming much more accepted in European countries, as well as in the U.S.’s liberal states, it still remains to be discussed in most Asian countries, most notably of all Japan. But those who remain silent about their true sexual preferences in Japan were given a new surge of hope after U.S. President Barack Obama publicly stated that he was in support of same-sex marriages. Japan is a country where homosexuality may be tolerated, but it is not to be openly discussed in almost any way.

Koyuki Higashi, 27, says that when the U.S. president voiced he was in favor of gay marriage, he felt like it was someone directly saying that it was ok to be herself. Now that everyone knows about Obama’s support, it feels like an unrivaled affirmation. Her partner, 34 year old Hiroko, also says that it was wonderful to see the president use his influence in such a way, even if he didn’t expect it have such meaning in another country on the other side of the planet.

Mark Bromley, the leader of the advocacy group Council for Global Equality, was sent by Obama’s administration to Japan in June, which was gay pride month, to discuss the idea that equality for same-sex couples was an important part of basic human rights. Unfortunately, warned David Wagner, a gay expatriate who has lived in Japan for 25 years, the gesture will most likely just fade away over time, as Japan may be tolerant, but they are also very slow to change. A small victory was won recently however, when Tokyo Disneyland consented to allowing same-sex wedding ceremonies at the theme park.

Shuhei Ninomiya, a law professor at Ritsumeikan University, said that bringing the gay marriage debate to Japan will be beneficial to everyone in terms of spurring discussion about the idea of a modern family. There are still laws in place in Japan that see discrimination against children born out of marriage, and require one parent to completely give up their custody in the event of a divorce, which almost always sees the father disappear. In Japan, where there is incredible pressure to conform to social norms, there is very little diversity in the image of marriage or what a family is. By hearing and discussing Obama’s public support of gay couples, Japanese society can see that there are different types of marriages for different types of people.

[via AFP]
Share Button
DISCUSS IT
Comment Policy : Our comments section is open and welcome to anyone who wishes to participate in discussion or share their point of view, regardless of what it may be. In order to limit spam and those who wish to impede meaningful conversation, we are now requiring users to log in with an account or verify their email address. However, the following behavior will result in your comment being deleted or, if continued, permanent removal from conversations: posting under multiple names, making hateful/racist comments, or making no valuable contribution by posting the same thing repeatedly.
  • http://akemi-mokoto.me/ Akemi Mokoto

    I hope gay marriage becomes legal in Japan.

  • FrackEuope

    It is wrong that it becomes more accepted in European countries: European countries less and less care for what their people think. There were protests in france which where silenced by the police using gas a beating. While normal marriage and family gets destroyed (to overcome “patriarchy” – a problem the EU thinks it can overcome by immigration and financially handcuffing it’s inhabitants), alternative forms of relationships are used to weaken the position of classical marriage. There is nothing gained by it, but the rights of the “traditional family” – that is, the right of autonomy AGAINST the state – are severely undermined. But with the European Union rolling towards totalitarism and the media working in favor of the powers to be, but not anymore as their careful observers and critiques, it all depends on the lobby that has the power. – However, it is pretty much a fact that something unnatural that is forced upon people again and again will not change peoples opinions, but result in a backlash.