Japan’s whalers call on Netherlands to take action against Sea Shepherd activists

Japan’s whalers call on Netherlands to take action against Sea Shepherd activists

In the wake of a dangerous stunt performed by the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, an animal activist group, when a Dutch-registered vessel came very close to two Japanese ships in the Atlantic Ocean last Friday, February 15, Japan asks Netherlands to take effective action against the group and require it to stop interfering with its annual whale hunt. This act marks one of the group’s first sabotage attempts against Japan’s so-called research whaling this season.

During a press conference, the agriculture, forestry and fisheries minister criticized the hardcore anti-whaling group, referring to what it did as “an unforgivable act that threatens legitimate whaling activities and the lives of crew members.” Sea Shepherd positioned itself between the two Japanese ships and, for a time, prevented the transfer of a recently harpooned whale to the fleet’s mothership.

Just recently in December, a United States appeals court issued an order restraining Sea Shepherd from further attacking the Japanese government-funded whaling fleet in the Southern Ocean or from approaching their ships on the open sea. With this latest incident, it is not surprising if the Tokyo-based Institute of Cetacean Research, which is in charge of the research whaling program, will file a complaint against the extremist group for being in contempt of court.

Share Button
DISCUSS IT
Comment Policy : Our comments section is open and welcome to anyone who wishes to participate in discussion or share their point of view, regardless of what it may be. In order to limit spam and those who wish to impede meaningful conversation, we are now requiring users to log in with an account or verify their email address. However, the following behavior will result in your comment being deleted or, if continued, permanent removal from conversations: posting under multiple names, making hateful/racist comments, or making no valuable contribution by posting the same thing repeatedly.
  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001196054130 Jamie McCroskey

    Up next will be more empty promises from the Netherlands, all talk no action.

    • BNB

      I don’t expect anything from the Netherlands. They give over $1.2 million a year to Sea Shepherd to “stop whale hunting” and also provide flags for their vessels. This complaint will be laughed at.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=689720739 Ima Adey

        Netherlands are right behind SSCS. After all they flag two of their ships.

        • ddpalmer

          Flags that they tried to pull a few years ago but their laws don’t allow them to. And unlike the SSCS, the Netherlands follow the laws.

          • Think

            What’s the big deal about “not following laws”? I mean, who cares?

            There is a very good, just and moral reason for civil disobedience here in order to stop an atrocity and environment destruction.

            Most people applaud the environmentalists for their courage and commitment … who applauds anyone for firing explosive harpoons into pregnant females and then drowning them and their calves in terrible pain?

            Applaud that and you are a sick psychopath.

          • ddpalmer

            “There is a very good, just and moral…”
            Based on your opinion. And guess what mister big ego? Your opinion isn’t shared by everyone.
            Claiming people say and do things that they never said and never did is pathetic and the refuge of scoundrels.

      • ddpalmer

        No they didn’t.
        A marketing firm that runs a lottery gave them the money.

      • Frederick

        The money given to SS comes from a postcode lottery, not the Dutch government. That money has typically gone to fund the Galapagos efforts, not anti-whaling.

  • RP

    The Japan Daily Press has proven itself to be a propaganda outlet supporting Japanese Whaling. The publications written and published so far has been the proof of this fact.

    This evidence id more prof of ow deep the corruption and political influence runs in Japan. While there may appear to be a veneer of western democracy in Japan, underneath Japan remains very much an Imperial society and culture full of Japanese-righteousness. No wonder why Japan rarely allows immigrants to become Japanese citizens. The Imperialist social elite that run Japan are hell bent to preserve Japanese cultural purity at any cost.

    Japanese Whaling is really a reflection of who Japan is as a world citizen and has shown it’s arrogance, brutality, cruelty and total lack of respect for life on planet earth.

    • http://japandailypress.com/ Adam Westlake

      Just because we are critical of Sea Shepherd’s actions does not mean we support whaling.

      • Gray Viking

        And the Australian news media is doing what ?

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001196054130 Jamie McCroskey

        It was honest and factual, what a nice change from AU articles.

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=551982606 Carmen Dalziel

          honest and factual? what planet are you on?

      • http://twitter.com/46nd2 46nd2

        Being critical in a journalistic way and what you do are completely different things. Seems like unending propaganda. I mean that as an assessment not hostility.

    • GetitRight

      The only arrogance shown is your inability to perceive that not everyone is extremist anti whaling, and that some, unlike you, can see the news as a matter of factly.

  • Sun Wu

    The range of the Sam Simon bought for 2Million USD was increased by additional investments of (to Seashepherd) additional 500 000USD.

    Increasing the range = building in of additional tanks (which is not approved by any classification society repulsery for merchant vessels)

    .
    On all 4 Seashepherd ships ILLEGAL fueling practices can be found in order to operate ships NOT designed for Antarctic expedtions of a couple of month (especially Ady Gil, Bridgit Bardot…)

    Seashepherd is run by unprofessionals who put the integrity of Southern Ocean and the life of 120 crew members on board their ships at risk (plus the lifes of whalers, of course).

    Point of interest for the Netherlands being the flagstate should be:

    1.) published videos showing irresponsible manoevers of Seashepherd-skippers captaining ships carrying (compared to ship’s size) huge amounts of fuel on board to increase range by illegal, structural changes of on ships hulls.

    2.) biographies of Skippers being in charge of Paul Watson’s fleet…unprofessionalism has a name.

    For anyone interested in the biography and personality of the warlord Paul Watson being responsible for the life of 120 mostly YOUNG (and mostly unexperienced and/or uneducated volunteers serving operation ZERO TOLERANCE (stupid name in times of a global world) I do recommend a reporting from The New Yorker from 2007…

    A Reporter at Large
    Neptune’s Navy
    Paul Watson’s wild crusade to save the oceans.
    by Raffi Khatchadourian November 5, 2007

    I do believe this nice piece of journalism to be proof enough why this warlord should be stopped immediately

    • Sun Wu

      From Neptune’s Navy, Watsons wild crusade to save the Oceans:
      ‘…Several years after ramming the Sierra, Watson gave himself the title of captain, though he does not have a captain’s license. “He loves to dress up in uniform, as ‘Captain Paul Watson,’ and suddenly there’s enough gold braid on his shoulders to skipper the Queen Mary,” David Sellers, an old friend and former Sea Shepherd crew member, told me. In the eighties, Sellers and Watson fought so bitterly over the seaworthiness of Watson’s ship that they did not speak for fifteen years. (Sellers, a licensed captain, had insisted that it was not safe for ocean travel.) Many of Watson’s colleagues from the seventies and eighties no longer work with him; they have grown tired either of the campaigns or of Watson’s style of leadership—“anarchy run by God,” a longtime volunteer called it. “He doesn’t like people who disagree with him.”…’

      • sidewinder

        Thanks Glenn Inwood / Hideoyoshi Toyotomi / DDPalmer you pro-whaling clowns are a joke. Sad to know there are people out there like that….

        • whiplash

          No one cares.

          • sidewinder

            Well obviously you do enough to post useless comments… douche.

          • whiplash

            Whatever.

          • sidewinder

            good comeback

          • whiplash

            Shhh.

          • sidewinder

            yawn whiplash.

          • whiplash

            Shhh.

          • sidewinder

            You going to make me?

          • whiplash

            It really doesn’t matter.

          • sidewinder

            shhhh

          • whiplash

            Nope.

      • Anonymous Legion

        You only need to be a licensed captain of a boat when inshore! In international waters a 5 year old baby can be the captain of a boat. My dog can be a captain. Why do you think Paul is safe to not be arrested in International waters because your idea of “law” doesnt apply. International Waters. Look it up sometime.

    • BNB

      You are like the propaganda arm of the whalers. My goodness, no one takes your posts seriously.

      • StopTrolling

        Pot calls the kettle black. And you are propaganda troll for….?

    • Anonymous Legion

      If Paul isnt a captain according to Sun Wu and nobody is trained(even though they are – how do you fly a fekkin helicopter without a license idiot!) – how come the Japs are the only ones to lose a man overboard and nobody on SS had ever died? I rest my case. Where does ramming the Ady Gill not qualify as bad seamanship by UNTRAINED and RECKLESS Jap freaks.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=689720739 Ima Adey

        The whalers have lost three men over the years. Some of them cannot handle whaling and appear to jump overboard from time to time. At least some of them have a conscience.

        • ddpalmer

          Typical psychopath, lack of compassion.

          Oh and only one his gone overboard, for unknown reasons.

          But continue following the SSCS Handbook’s mandate to lie when they truth won’t work and to lie even when the truth will work.

  • Silveradocyn

    I believe the Netherlands supports the role of the Sea Shepherd organization in working to enforce the laws protecting the Southern Whale Sanctuary.
    It seems odd that after the Sea Shepherd ship has clearly documented fuel spilling into the southern ocean that Sea Shepherd fueling capabilities would be discussed.

    • Sun Wu

      I think I smell diesel…do you smell it too, Paul? :)
      You have listened to the radio-recording published by SS, correct? Think it is called a mind-blowing Seashepherd evidence :) Could you possibly tell me why they don’t publish any pictures of this clearly documented oil-spill? :) And I am still wondering why there is ABSOLUTELY no picture of the Ady Gil when sinking…just asking, now SS is saying they had time enough to pump out all the fuel, I assume it was not looking nasty :)
      PS: why don’t you put a 200liter barrel of fuel in the trunk of your car and drive by your local police-station a couple of time until say tell you about the dangers of your fueling-practises. They might even clearly document it, unfortunately in the Southern Ocean is noone documenting…so Paul does it all himself.
      You got to know: Paul is know to be a friend of the truth…especially when trying to mobilize funding.
      PPS: everybody here is aware that SS and Paul is currently facing two courtcases being sued by Ady Gil and by the skipper Bethune, correct?
      I would call it just some more evidence on the integrity of Paul’s surrounding…as long as it consists of young people being easily to be manipulated.

      • sidewinder

        I smell ICR/Japanese govt/Pro-whaling lobbyist propaganda everywhere here… Why does Japan keep embarrassing themselves? A country with a poor economy, island disputes with Russia & China, continue with such an expensive expedition spending tax payer & donated money? Is it beyond absurd.

        Tired of their excuses yet: It’s research, Whales eat our fish, it’s cultural…etc

        • whiplash

          First its diesel fuel and now they’re smelling propaganda. Bunch of whackos.

          • sidewinder

            Post something useful or constructive. ‘Whacko’. Do you actually have anything of substance to contribute?

          • whiplash

            Pfft who cares.

          • sidewinder

            quality improving by the minute… nothing else to do?

          • whiplash

            What a whacko.

          • sidewinder

            What a douche bag.

          • whiplash

            That has no relevance at all.

          • sidewinder

            Not to this discussion it doesn’t. But to you it does – because you are a complete utter douche bag.

          • whiplash

            Nah not really.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Richard-Brunt/100000416143219 Richard Brunt

    Since 1986, Japan has killed 20,000 whales in the Antarctic International Whale Sanctuary. They call it research, but with all these thousands of whales and and 26 years of whaling, how much scientific research have they published? Zero.

    It’s not research, that is a lie and everyone knows it. If they are not conducting research, Japan’s activities are in serious violation of International law. Countries are afriad to upset Japan, an important trading partner, so they do not enforce these laws. Sea Shepherd is the only group with the courage to attempt to enforce compliance with international law.

    If someone was killing cats in your neighborhood, and the police would not act, would you? Would detroyng the tools used by the cat killers be “extremism”, “radical environmentalism” or immoral? I think not.

    God speed, Sea Shepherd. No more lies from Japan, no more media spin, no more unecessary, illegal killing of one of the most intelligent species on earth.

    • ddpalmer

      Lie much?

      First the Whale sanctuary wasn’t in existence in 1986 and its establishment didn’t follow the requirements, so legally it doesn’t really exist.

      Second Japan has published hundreds of scientific papers based on the research.

      • sidewinder

        Didn’t take long for the ICR puppets to start the propaganda. Published papers? Sure, perhaps. Have you seen/read them? Nothing much there, take some measurements, collect some tissue samples in order to ‘tick’ the research box and justify the entire slaughter. A slaughter that is totally unnecessary. For what exactly? The Research is bogus. The whale meat demand is barely there… Selfish national pride?

        • whiplash

          Nah who cares, the whales aren’t even endangered. Why don’t you go cry about some cows and sheep instead?

          • SAVETHECOWS

            amen to that.

          • sidewinder

            Not true – they target Fin whales, and with their North Pacific hunt, they take all sorts, Sei, Brydes and Sperm. Useful comment you have made. Well done.

          • whiplash

            Nah they’re all good to go. That’s why no one cares.

          • sidewinder

            You might find yourself on your own on this one.

          • whiplash

            Again, you will note the total lack of people who care.

          • sidewinder

            yeah right? So why not leave? Why keep coming back?

          • whiplash

            Because no one cares.

          • sidewinder

            Not true.

          • ddpalmer

            Yeah 17 fin whales in 25 years. that will just drive them to extinction in what a million years?

          • Bahl Sanchin

            Speaking of cows and sheep, just how is your family doing, Wimplick?

      • Tfill

        Why are they taking whales in the sanctuary at all?
        “Japan refuses to make the information it collects available for independent review….
        The fin whales are highly desired because they yield arguably the best quality of tail meat (onomi).[16] Japanese research vessels refers to the harvested whale meat as incidental byproducts which have resulted from lethal study. ` In Japan, the research whale meat were sold at officially published prices,[17] but since 2011 an auction bid system has been adopted,[18] and actual realized prices have not been posted.” per Wiki

        • ddpalmer

          More lies.
          The Japanese have published hundreds of papers and they turn over their data to the IWC every year. And the IWC Scientific Committee thanks them for the data.
          So Fin whales are desired. Big deal. They have taken 17 in 25 years while in the past 6 years Iceland has taken 270 Fin whales. Maybe the SSCS needs to use their direct action against Icelandic whaling?

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=689720739 Ima Adey

        Hundreds of fake science papers, commented on by other fake scientists to prop up their fake research lie. When it all comes down to it, the Japanese whaling research has as much credence and honour as the government that backs them.

        • ddpalmer

          Yeah, respecting international scienec journals like ‘Nature’ are fake and publish lies.

          • Think

            The only paper published in Nature was a propaganda piece. The ICR are a propaganda unit for commercial whaling.

            Nagasaki, F. 1990. The Case for Scientific Whaling. Nature 334: 189-190.

            You just sank your own credibility again ddpalmer. The problem is, you really don’t understand what science is and you lack the standing to judge the quality and nature of the work that has been done (it has been widely criticized by experts).

            It’s not science … it’s aim is purpose is purely to justify commercial whale slaughter.

            What motivates to do what you are doing?

          • ddpalmer

            Nature was one example, but I am sure that would be lost on you. As your credibilty sinks out of sight.

            “…it’s aim is purpose is purely to justify commercial whale slaughter.”
            Did you finally read the Japanese Research Plan? They make no secret that the major goal of the plan is to provide the IWC with the data they need to evaluate the situation with the Minke population. lift the moratorium if they meet the guidlines and set a commercial hunting limit.

          • Think

            The world has already decided, no more whaling.

            400 million US dollars over the last 25 years with no measurable benefit to society, 30 billion taxpayer yen in subsidies, $29 million from the Tsunami relief fund … and yet the industry has dropped to 1% of its peak. Even Japan has decided the industry is over.

            All that are left are a few old industry cronies living off government handouts.

            What motivates you to fight for them of all people … money?

          • ddpalmer

            No the “world” hasn’t decided or all whaling would have stopped. And no the ‘whole world except Japan’ hasn’t decided either.

            Why does ther have to be a benefit to society? Should anything that doesn’t benefit society be outlawed?

            So the industry has decline. Should anything that has declined just be scrapped?

            And if you are right about the decline then it will naturally fade away like it has in some other countries. But by making it seem to be an attack on Japan, the SSCS has removed the natural market forces that would bring it to an end. They have given the whalers all the ammunition they need to convince the majority of the Japanese people that they deserve to be supported.

          • Think

            All 7 billion members of the world may very well not not decided have but the representative IWC certain has …

            No more commercial whaling,
            No credibility for commercial pressure groups.

            It’s simple. And it looks like Sea Shepherd just shut the poachers down again.

          • ddpalmer

            The IWC, especially at the time of the moratorium, was not representative of the world.
            You do understand the word moratorium and temporary right?
            And I am sure the SSCS will be right there stopping the JARPN hunt of endangered whales right? Or will they be absent again? Maybe busy at the Cannes Film Festival, sure saved lots of marine life there.

          • Think

            ddpalmer knows nothing about running an NGO as well as nothing about law or science.

            SSCS is a small NGO, it only has so many resources, it can only cover so many campaigns at once … and doing publicity and PR is part of running an NGO. To focus on the most extreme and easiest to resolve abuse makes sense.

            For an NGO to be able to send some of its representative to a celebrity event to find celebrities to endorse its campaigns and raise highly cost effective publicity it is very sensible thing to do.

            Why on earth would you be spending your life defending a highly environmentally destructive meat slaughter industry?

          • ddpalmer

            Think knows nothing about logic.

            If an NGO has a limited budget wouldn’t it make logical sense to concentrate on the worst case of what you claim to be fighting against? And Think even seems to agree, but somehow his delusion finds that sustainable hunting of non-endangered whales is the ‘most extreme’ and not the hunt of multiple endangered whale species.

          • Think

            ddpalmer harpoons themselves in foot again.

            The IWC democratically decided that after 1985/86 killing for commercial purposes shall be zero and in 1990 and in 1994 that the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary would be recognized.

            Japan arrogantly refused to accept that decision and has since exploited a loop hole to deliberately and provocatively carry on commercial slaughter in the Sanctuary.

            It’s a lie to suggest that the Japanese whale slaughtermen would have stopped and what you are copy and pasting is merely a device with which to attempt to weaken and de-stablize support for SSCS.

            Unfortunately for the ICR, it won’t work. The conflict will have to be continued until it ends.

            The ICR a runaway juggernaut within Japan with all other sorts of commercial and political influences involved.

            The world, and increasingly Japanese tax payers, have recognised they need outside pressure to do so. SSCS are not the only team in the game.

          • ddpalmer

            While Think harpoons himself in the head.

            In 1948 the ICRW, which forms the basis for the IWC, was voluntarily agreed to by 7 nations. And no Article of the ICRW has been changed since. Since than many other countries voluntarily signed the ICRW. Japan signed in 1951 and thus had no input into the wording of the ICRW.

            The ICRW clearly allows research whaling with no restrictions.

            The ICRW clearly allows members to object to any resolution.

            The ICRW clearly requires a stated scientific basis for establishing any sanctuary.

            So whether Japan was ‘arrogant’ or not, they where just following the document that all members agreed to when they commenced issuing permits under Article VIII. Something that they and other members had done many times before 1986.

            So the democratically decided Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary violated their own requirements. And Japan’s objection was just a further following of the ICRW, while the countries voting for the sanctuary full well knew that they were violating the ICRW. Since that time the IWC’s Scientific Committee sponsored a study that found the sanctuary serves no scientific purpose.

            It’s a lie to suggest that the Japanese whalers wouldn’t have stopped, as no one knows what would have happened. I merely discussed a general case of an industry with decreasing demand will naturally decrease with the lowering demand. Anyone with a working brain can figure that out.

            I also like how the anti-whalers use ‘loophole’ like it is illegal or dirty and evil. You might want to look at the definition sometime. Especially when Sea Shepherd themselves uses loopholes. In the US they get out of paying federal taxes due to a loophole, they also get out of paying sale tax due to a loophole and in Australia they have used a loophole to avoid paying tax on ship’s fuel.

            And the Japanes taxpayers have shown in polls that there is more support for continuing whaling than for ceasing it.

          • Think

            ddpalmer’s understanding of law is a loose as their understanding of what science is. What’s the point? All they want to do is confuse the issue.

            An old woman is watching the infantry march by to see her son. She says, “Look, they’re all marching out of step except my Bobbie!”.

            The IWC agreed on a moratorium on commercial whaling. Japan arrogantly refuses to accept it and deceptively continues on commercial whaling under the guise of it Oishii scientific recipe research.

            The ICR’s actions cost the economy of Japan 100s of times more than it make, except for all those kind Sea Shepherd followers who spend their holiday money in Taiji.

            The them, it is just all about money, and the industry is losing money hand over fist. For us, its about animal rights and stopping environmental destruction.

            We’d oppose it even if it was politically construed to being “legal” just in the same as we opposed slavery when it was “legal” because, as Mr. Bumble taught us, the law can be an ass. “Legal” often means nothing, it’s just a device of vested interests.

            We’ll fight for their rights not to suffer and to be left alone in peace in the same way as we fought for worker’s rights, women’s rights, children’s rights and so on.

            You, in the pockets of the paymasters will perhaps never understand that. Enjoy your silver pieces when you spend them.

            When Bobby (you) comes back from the war, what will you tell your children?

            “Daddy, what did you do in the Eco-War?”

            “Oh, I fought for the right of a few grumpy Japanese men to explode whales, drag them about dying and then gun them down and electrocute them to death.”

            “Why did you do that, Daddy?”

            You tell us now.

          • ddpalmer

            So you have no response to the facts, as expected. Are you allergic to facts or just don’t like to face reality?

          • Think

            You’ve ignored every fact given to you. You don’t understand the principles of law and science. What is be the point of discussion things with you? You mind is not at a level where it can understand things yet.

            If you are not being paid to do what you do, and good luck to you if you are, you are just motivated by irrational and embarrassing prejudices and seeking to make any constructive discussion impossible.

            Why do you really do what you are doing?

          • ddpalmer

            What facts have I ignored? And what principles of law and science?
            You do realize that despite your ego, your opinions aren’t facts or laws or science?

          • Think

            You’re incapable of telling the difference between than science and a propaganda piece by a commercial interest.

            What motivates you to spend your time defending an extravagant, environmentally destructive and uneconomical meat slaughter industry of all things?

            I could understand if you defend medical research, overseas aid, child education, human rights … but spending your life defending a meat slaughter industry!?!

            You must be getting paid to do this. No one would do so for no money.

            Not even the pariah industry whore Glenn ‘Whaling and Tobacco Industry’ Inwood.

          • ddpalmer

            You claim anything you don’t agree with as false science. that is delusional.

            I have explained my motivation and you just claim I am lying. More evidence of your delusions.

          • Think

            “You’re deluded” … “no, you’re deluded” … “no, you’re the deluded one” … “oh no, I am not, you’re deluded” … “Amn’t” … “Are” … “Amn’t” … “Are” … “Amn’t” … Amn’t …Amn’t”.

            For goodness sake, I’d be offended little girls if I said you argued like you.

            What I said is “you don’t actually understand what science is”, meaning you lack the experience, training and integrity to discern what is good and bad, and be honest about it.

            One cannot accusing the anti-whaling lobby of ‘culinary’ imperialism and then afterwards claim it is not cooking it’s ‘science’ … and in science you don’t eat your samples or sell them to the local yakitori bar.

          • Think

            typo … “For goodness sake, I’d be offending little girls if I said you argued like one.”

          • ddpalmer

            Except we haven’t argued about being deluded. So that whole screed was pointless.

            And you have no idea about my experience, training and integrity so that claim is also wrong. Now if you had actual examples that would be different, but as…it is just hot air.

            I never accused the anti-whaling lobby of ‘culinary’ imperialism, so just more pointless hot air. And the international regulations REQUIRES the whales to be processed.

      • http://twitter.com/46nd2 46nd2

        Butt hurt much. Is this the end of Japanese Whaling completely … yep … oh ya … sing it with me now! ♫

        • ddpalmer

          Nope.

          Ever heard of JARPN? SSCS tries to ignore it but that is where the real endangered whales are hunted by Japan every year with no SSCS ship within 1000 miles.

          • Truth

            You see to be gloating over this and I don’t understand why. You did not answer me what you motivation in all this was and why you were supporting a Japanese slaughter industry that could not survive without being propped up by government funds.

            JARPN seems to happen mostly in the Japanese EEZ (I have not looked to closely at where else), why would Sea Shepherd come into it and risk losing their vessels?

            That would not make strategic sense, would it?

          • ddpalmer

            You seem to be stalking me. Going back to 2 month old comments is kind of pathetic.

            And sorry but most of the JARPN II area is outside the Japanese EEZ in international waters, just like in JARPA II. The Sea Shepherds are ready to give their lives for the whales but you postulate that they are worried about their vessels?

            But your right it wouldn’t make strategic sense for a marine conservation NGO with a focus on whales to go where they can protect endangered whale species. Better to use the summer visiting the Cannes Film Festival.

          • Truth

            Mr Palmer, it’s seems you’re the one of many who are stalking these anti-whaling people all over the internet. I just cannot work out why you are so passionate about a small meat slaughtering industry in Japan, but you never answer me on that to explain.

            We have a lot of people motivated by Japan hate on other issues on this website, it’s just strange to find someone who is motivated by hate defending anything Japanese. Hippie hate perhaps?

            Now you say JARPN II. I read that many resolutions have been passed by the IWC to urge Japan to cease issuing special permits for whaling and to limit research to non-lethal methods. I must agree with them.

            From a scientific point of view, it would seem to be the moral thing to do, to exhaust all non-lethal methods of research first, and I find it difficult to understand why so many killings are necessary except, as the protest say, to run a meat industry in disguise.

            So, please talk with me rather than at me.

            Why are you so motivated and angry about these issues? There would seem to be so many better causes, even just commercial cause, if you want to do some good and defend Japanese interests or people.

            These bureaucracies just suck up so much money in Japan and mostly it is just done for LDP votes from the countryside.

          • ddpalmer

            Yeah go ahead and keep projecting, anyone with a bit of logic can plainly see who is stalking who.

            “From a scientific point of view, it would seem to be the moral thing to do…”
            You mean YOUR morals, right? Because most people realize that their morals aren’t the same as other people’s morals.

            “…exhaust all non-lethal methods of research first…”
            Even the IWC Scientific Committee has agreed that some data can’t be collected with non-lethal methods.

            Japan’s research plan explains their sample size. It is fairly simple statistics, the same statistics used by scientists all the time to determine sample sizes for research plans. I would be happy to read any scientific refutation of the math behind Japan’s sample size, but in the past no one has ever presented one.

          • Truth

            Actually the scientific morality I am talking about is based on Japanese animal welfare law which states that animal suffering should be avoided or minimized as much as possible.

            I am sure the IWC Scientific Committee is correct scientifically, but that does that would still not answer whether those particular elements are ultimately necessary or not.

            The ICR’s research is not pure science. It’s being done with the intention of commercial exploitation. I would be much happier if our taxes were being spent on pure science rather than propping up a dying business so the LDP can make votes out of it.

            You come across as being highly embittered and angry about this issue and I have no idea why? It’s only a slaughter house industry in Japan which employs very few people.

            What motivates you to do so? Why that cause or business of all the dying industries in Japan?

            Every time I ask, you ignore my question.

          • ddpalmer

            Oh, well you should have said that to start with. Japan isn’t vegan is it?
            So the animal welfare law allows killing animals for food, right? And I think we
            can agree the appropriate way to kill a chicken is different than the
            appropriate way to kill a cow which is different than the appropriate way to
            kill a tuna. So the IWC has stated what the appropriate way to kill a whale is
            and the whalers follows that method. So not being familiar with the Japanese
            animal welfare law, just what are the whalers doing that violate it?

            What do you mean the ICR’s research isn’t pure science? What proof do you
            have that it is being done with the intention of commercial exploitation? If
            your not happy then work to change it, which your comments here aren’t going to
            do.

            And whether someone thinks the research is necessary would depend on that person’s biases wouldn’t it? I would hardly expect someone who is against all whaling to think any lethal research is necessary, just like I wouldn’t expect a vegan to think research into how to get more meat from pigs is necessary.

          • Truth

            Why do you keep avoiding my question?

            We’re discuss Japan Daily News here. The article is about Japan’s whale slaughter meat industry.

            What motivates you?

          • ddpalmer

            No, I am discussing world wide whaling at one of many sites that discusses aspects of it.

            And the title of this article clearly says “Netherlands”. Making it clear to
            any rational human that it isn’t a purely Japanese issue.

            What is it that causes you to be irrational?

    • Irving

      You libtards would give your left brain cell to have coitus with one of those whales, wouldn’t you?

  • BNB

    The Dutch National Postcode Lottery just gave Sea Shepherd 900,000 euros, about what, a few weeks ago?

    I don’t think a complaint by the filthy barbaric whalers is going to get very far in the Netherlands.

    This tactic is nothing new, blocking the slipway. The Sea Shepherds have been doing it for years, yet this article is written in a way that the Sea Shepherd took it to a new level by doing, yeah, what they always do. Give me a break.

    • Ryohei Uchida

      Sea Shepherd have taken their campaign to news levels this season. And that level is absolute inactivity and irrelevance.

      This injunction has got them beat, and Paul Watson is in self-preservation mode. Unfortunately for the poor, innocent and sentinent whales, Paul comes first no matter what.

      Sea Shepherd will ride out this season in their current holding pattern. They’ll sail around the Southern Ocean belching out carbon emissions and issuing the occasional press release about “having the whalers on the run and shutting down the whaling”, but really, they’re just winding down the clock waiting for the whalers to finish their harvest and head for home (at which point Sea Shepherd will no doubt “escort” the whaling fleet from the whaling grounds).

      But then reality comes into play and the real problems start for dear old Sea Shepherd and Paul Watson. The motion for contempt will have progressed in the US courts, and suddenly Paul has no where to go. Interpol’s noose pulls ever tighter. Stayed tuned.

      • BNB

        Holding pattern? Even the Japanese whalers have posted videos just this week of Sea Shepherd forcefully obstructing and blocking them. I believe you know this too. That makes you a liar. Very pathetic. If you are going to debate things, at least have some honor and tell the truth.

        Your post is pure propaganda, it’s pathetic. The whalers will finish their harvest? Yeah, right. Again, even your own whalers website shows Sea Shepherd blocking their ability to “harvest”.

        • Anonymous Legion

          Good. Im glad SS blocked the whaling. They should cut off the whales tails to stop them being used as meat or for the fake science. Im all in favour of letting the dead whales slip into the sea and be injected by SS with bleach so they cant be eaten by the Japs. End the Japanese madness. Didnt 2 nukes teach this country anything.

      • sidewinder

        Wow ICR Propaganda hard at work.

      • Paladin

        Ryohei’s a plant for the whalers. He’s on EVERY single post regarding this issue and always vehemently spitting out propaganda.
        It’s always “Paul Watson’s going down!” and “You’re all fools for supporting SS!”. He might even mix it up a bit with a little “SS isn’t really doing anything!” at the bottom of the very story where the Whalers say that SS performed a dangerous stunt!!
        Here in the U.S., we call that being a tool.

      • Bahl Sanchin

        How many whales have your vermin actually been able to kill this season? How far off their quotas are they? Is that due to the actions of the Sea Shepherds, or just the whalers own ineptitude?

    • ddpalmer

      The Dutch National Postcode Lottery is run by a marketing agency and is not in any way affiliated with the Netherlands government.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=689720739 Ima Adey

        They are great people who run it and donate to SSCS every year.

        • ddpalmer

          And what does that have to do with my comment?

          Oh that’s right, nothing. Just like most of your comments contain nothing.

  • Ryohei Uchida

    It’s difficult to see why Japan bothered with the diplomatic request. Because Sea Shepherd isn’t actually doing anything.

    Sure, the Bob Barker sailed close to the ICR’s vessels in violation of the US court injunction, but it seems they have since thought better of it (perhaps some Sea Shepherd executives have Interpol Red Notices issued for them and need the US has a safe haven from arrest and extradition, who knows) and have resorted to doing absolutely nothing. There are no acid attacks, no rammings, no illegal boardings. Just nothing.

    At least Greenpeace protested and held up signs. Sea Shepherd isn’t even doing that. How can they justify having raked in millions upon million of dollars in donations under the guise of ‘shutting down whaling’ when they’re doing nothing of the sort? Surely the time has come for Sea Shepherd to start refunding those donations? Or at the very least, Sea Shepherd could forward those funds to Greenpeace who actually spend their money on the causes they promote.

    • BNB

      Pure propaganda. Even the ICR has a video from just a couple days ago showing Sea Shepherd forcefully blocking the transfer of a whale. The recent whaling industry complaints are that of obstruction, cutting lines, etc.

      This is EXACTLY what donations are for and Sea Shepherd is doing a killer job.

      Your post is pure propaganda and you know it. Is there zero honor in Japan anymore?

    • Paladin

      Of course! THAT’S why the ICR is complaining! They’re complaining that SS isn’t DOING anything! So I guess it wasn’t really a dangerous stunt then, eh? So is the IRC lying or are you ’cause ONE of you is

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=689720739 Ima Adey

        They are all reading from the ICR handbook…quite funny when you realise what they are doing. SSCS are pIrates , ( acording to the ICR handbook) but at the same time SSCS do nothing. They dont save whales! They are not costing the ICR anything! According to the ICR troll handbook. They need to be arrested though! FOR DOING NOTHING!!! Mixed messages abound in that particular tome from Hades.

        • ddpalmer

          No SSCS are pirates according to the US 9th Circuit Court.

  • BNB

    The Dutch have approved over $1.2 million USD per year to the Sea Shepherds for the explicit purpose of stopping things like “whales being hunted”. Good luck with your complaint to the Dutch.

    ["Sea Shepherd has gratefully received an annual financial contribution of
    €900,000 from the Postcode Lottery since 2007. Recently this
    collaboration was assessed and approved for continutation by the
    Lottery’s Board of Commissioners. “Living creatures in the world's
    oceans are faring badly and whales are still being hunted. This is why
    the National Postcode Lottery feels it is important to continue
    supporting Sea Shepherd and is looking forward to continuing the
    collaboration,” said Judith Lingeman. It was decided that the structural
    support would continue at least through 2017."]

    • Ryohei Uchida

      €900,000 will help with Sea Shepherd’s ever increasing legal bills. But it won’t go very far. Between the legal actions with Pete Bethune, Ady Gil, the ICR, the Maltese fishing company, the German legal system, the Japanese legal system and the Costa Rican legal system, etc etc, it’s just a drop in the ocean.

      Better start donating if you want to see more episodes of your favorite TV show, eh kiddo?

      • BNB

        I don’t think they have very serious funding issues at the moment. Considering they just added 3 additional vessels over the last few years and have continued some serious support in the Galapagos. Sea Shepherd will be just fine.

        As for the Japanese taxpayer? Eh… not so much.

        • Ryohei Uchida

          Well better hope that Sea Shepherd haven’t got too much of their money sitting in US bank accounts where the courts can get to it. Because that’s just the kind of thing courts like to freeze if they find you in contempt of their rulings.

          • sidewinder

            Maybe if the Japanese govt stops using Tsunami relief funds in pursuit of SS and propping up whaling, then the Japanese people who still don’t have homes to live in can actually have a better life.

          • whiplash

            Who cares how the Japanese govt spends its money.

          • sidewinder

            Who cares what you have to say. You don’t add anything useful or perhaps it’s because you are incapable.

          • whiplash

            See like I keep saying, no one cares.

          • sidewinder

            so why are you here?

          • whiplash

            It doesn’t matter.

          • sidewinder

            of course not because no one cares about you douche bag

          • whiplash

            Care factor remains unchanged at zero.

          • sidewinder

            Good for you. Now you can find something else to do perhaps?

          • whiplash

            That is possible, but not relevant in the slightest.

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=689720739 Ima Adey

            Who cares if Sea Shepherd stop the whale poachers?

          • gixio

            You should stop with your tunnel vision.

          • sidewinder

            Tunnel? Really? It’s more like big picture. You are ok with tax payer funds misspent?

      • Paladin

        Keep wishing Ryohei. THEY’RE getting the good press, Japan is generally denounced around the world for what they’re doing. (And rightly so.) You’re betting long odds if you’re betting against Sea Shepherd.

      • Bahl Sanchin

        Where’s another good Tsunami when you need one?

    • ddpalmer

      Please stop lying.
      The Dutch National Postcode Lottery is not affiliated with or part of the Dutch government, It is a lottery run by a marketing company.

      • Think

        The Dutch National Postcode Lottery is 3rd largest private donor in the world, its ambassadors include ex-Prime Minister Tony Blair, ex-President Bill Clinton, Richard Branson and ex-President Nelson Mandela.

        It’s licensed by the government of the Netherlands. Obviously a company runs it, who do you expect to do so … some nuns?

        BTW, who supports the whale abusers?

        • ddpalmer

          And the Dutch government has no more to do with it than any other company licensed in the Netherlands. Their choice of recipients in no way is influenced by the Netherlands government and doesn’t indicate support by the Netherlands government.

          • Think

            ddpalmer sinks their credibility again.

            Not true. One needs a special license granted by the Minister of Justice and supervision by the Dutch government’s Gaming Control Board

          • ddpalmer

            And after you get this special license (that how many other groups have?) what say does the Minister of Justice or the Gaming Control Board have on which groups get the money? That would be ZERO.
            The special license is to ensure it isn’t a scam that will us ethe name of charity to get people to buy the tickets then only give a pittance to charity while the people running the lottery get rich.
            And the Gaming Control Board is to ensure the winners are fairly picked and that the lottery isn’t rigged. They have nothing to do with which charities get any money.
            The US branch of Sea Shepherd is chartered by Washington State. Does the state have any say in how they operate? They are also registered as a 501(c)3 with the Internal Revenue Service and the IRS supervises them. Does the IRS get to say what projects they undertake?
            LOL, talk about a sinking credibility.

          • Think

            ddpalmer fudges the issue again.

            I never suggested the government decides upon the recipient. I only point out you were wrong to it was merely a business run by a marketing company as if to discredit it.

            Its license relating to charities is clear and supported and monitored at a high level. It would not, e.g. be allowed to fund a “terrorist” organization.

          • ddpalmer

            Well Think you should know all about fudging as it seems to be all you do.
            The Dutch government makes sure the lottery is run fairly and they make sure the charities are really charities. That is it. They don’t say they are good charities or that the charities do work supported by the government. They don’t condone or condemn any organization that recieves money from the marketing company that runs the lottery, one of five in multiple countries that it runs.
            That is all I have contended from the start despite your attempts to twist it into something else while concurrently trying to imply that the reciept of funds from the Postalcode lottery is some kind of approval from the government.

  • chris murray

    Sea Shepherd obeyed the USA court order. Japan has polluted the southern Ocean with and illegal oil. Why does Japan need other countries to help their illegal whaling? Cant Japan stand on their own two feet? No they cant for what they do is wrong.

  • sidewinder

    Japan is an international disgrace and embarrassment. Propping up an industry with Tsunami relief funds is absolutely disgusting. What is the ICR really trying to achieve? There is no demand for whale meat. Is this some sort of selfish national pride? It sure isn’t a cultural tradition to have a fleet of ships + floating abbatoir dumping blood and waste into the waters off the Anatarctic coast….

    • whiplash

      The whales aren’t even endangered so who cares.

      • sidewinder

        See above comment – and get your facts in order.

        • whiplash

          Yeah whatever.

          • sidewinder

            yeah man, cool

          • whiplash

            No it isn’t.

          • sidewinder

            Quality. Total quality.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=689720739 Ima Adey

        Why do you care about people who do care? The fact is the whales are protected inside whale sanctuaries.

      • Bahl Sanchin

        Neither are the whalers. Time to slaughter them too.

        • http://twitter.com/RSPW_DEP David Powell

          No. Killing human beings is murder. Step back and think about this.

    • Think before you Speak

      If something as little as whaling makes a whole country an international disgrace and embarrassment, its a whole lot of groveling the other countries would need to do on other matters. You should get rid of that unnecessary hatred for a whole culture and actually think what your message implies, as no country is disgrace free.

      • sidewinder

        You have missed the point.

        • whiplash

          There is no point. And even if there was, no one cares.

          • sidewinder

            so why check back here constantly if you don’t care?

          • whiplash

            That is irrelevant.

          • sidewinder

            it’s relevant to your whole ‘who cares’ platform.

          • whiplash

            No it isn’t. Stop making things up.

          • sidewinder

            what is being made up?

          • whiplash

            It doesn’t matter.

          • sidewinder

            shut up douche

          • whiplash

            Nah, who cares.

        • Think before you Speak

          My point still stands. Its not good to lump a whole nation no matter what the reason.

  • AnimuX

    It seems the Steve Irwin and Bob Barker have both just rammed the Nisshin Maru. Take that Japan!

    • ddpalmer

      You must have missed the SSCS memo. They claim the Nisshin maru rammed them, repeatedly.

  • Think

    It appears this discussion has attracted a score of habitual anti-Sea Shepherd and pro-whaling commentators who follow this issue around numerous forums and news sites.

    I’d like to dress you all directly. Please note, I am not using any disrespectful language to do so although, on track record, I am forced to expect disrespectful responses on you behalf back.

    As an outsider to the conflict, I am trying to understand your position and motivation. Honestly, why are you doing this? What really motivates you?

    I, personally, don’t believe you are all paid shills, although I can believe that there are some who would seek to derail reasonable conversations. The killing of whales will never been a humane act and is an entirely unnecessary act. Ultimately, it is only in the financial interest of a very small group of individuals. Merely 10s of people who, I am fairly sure do not bother to waste their own time flaming blogs even in Japanese.

    I have asked this already but have not got to real answers yet, are any of you capable of being really honest about this?

    I can understand why many individuals, out of compassion, ethics or conservation, would want the slaughtering to stop. That is simple and obvious to understand. Most human beings experience revulsion from cruelty. I cannot understand why any uninvolved parties would fight for another’s right to be cruel or destructive.

    If Paul Watson “stole your girlfriend”, for example, I can understand why you might be pissed at him, but I cannot see why that would translate into an obsession with supporting the Japanese whaling industry. All the same, if Paul Watson did “steal your girlfriend” and you spent years of your life following the NGO he works for around blogs distracting conversation, I’d say that was a pretty bad case of unhealthy stalking and you ought to either get even, man to man, or get over it.

    I use the example of “stealing a girlfriend” because it seems to be the motivation behind much of Ady “Mr Sugar Daddy” Gil’s motivation (even when it is not true) which make his combination of self-promotion, paying for young women and nuisances suits utterly embarrassing.

    Yes, I find Sea Shepherd’s propaganda sloppy to the point of being immoral at times but I would not say that is bad enough to inspire me to become a stalker against them. Nor would it distract me from the actual issue at hand, the inhumanity of whaling and the even greater dishonesties and malfeasances of the ICR.

    • Banananana

      Eww the thought of Paul Watson with any woman is disgusting. What self-respecting woman would go within 500 yards of that obese and blubberous buffoon? Even that whale he jumped on all those years ago promptly died of disgust when he tried to gaze longingly into its eyes.

      • Think

        Women are surprisingly attracted to power and charm, and especially a man who shows compassion for animals.

        And some women like big men, just as some men like big women.

        There’s no question, you’re going to pull 100 times more by being an eco-terrorist than being a butcher or a harpooner on a whaling ship.

        No contest. Whalers are social pariahs these days.

        • Banananana

          Can Paul even see his own todger these days?

          Hopefully none of the homies in the Costa Rican prisons have a fat fetish…!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=689720739 Ima Adey

    The Japanese are in violation of an Australian high court order against them. They must stop their illegal whale poaching operations now. As we speak they are presently trying to ram the SSCS ships as well as the Korean Tanker Sun Laurel, disabling their lifeboat. Tokyo has no right to be inside Australian waters, ramming Australian ships with Australian crews on board. Bob Brown said it best, he called the Japanese whalers actions “Grand Piracy”.
    Tokyo needs to pull their illegal whaling ships out of the Australian whale sanctuary now and go home.

    • ddpalmer

      Have you read that Australian FEDERAL COURT order? I suggest you do. Then you can come back and correct your claims.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=689720739 Ima Adey

        Its probably a different version to the one you have in your ICR handbook DD>

        • ddpalmer

          Well I don’t know of any ICR handbook. But I read the court decision from the courts own website.

  • http://twitter.com/46nd2 46nd2

    One of the Nishin Maru’s accidently rammed the Korean refueling vessel and they none too happy … Saya Nara whaling program!

  • Bahl Sanchin

    How much of the Tsunami Relief Fund did the Japanese government have to steal this year to support the barbaric and illegal whale slaughter. You people are vermin and your ships should be sent to the bottom of the sea.

    • ddpalmer

      How can the Japanese government steal money that belongs to them?

  • Anonymous Legion

    Eat shit Jap whaling scum. You stole 30million TSUNAMI fund to make sure you whale. Should the world ever help you again if you steal disaster relief money. Go to hell. Sea Shepherd WILL STOP YOU and the world is watching you.

    • ddpalmer

      Nice lie.

      The Japanese government GAVE them 30 million form the Japanese tax money placed in a tsunami relief fund. And the whaling fleet met the requirements of that fund.

  • Anonymous Legion

    194 comments earlier.Now only 136. These wankers are deleting them. japan Daily Press burn in hell!

  • Anthony1223

    Take action, don’t talk too much. Stop buying Japanese seafood products and stop going to Japanese restaurants world wide.Display all the pictures killing the whales by Japanese at populous places .Let the world see the ugly face of Japanese.

  • Think

    There is no doubt. The whale slaughter industry loses Japan far more money and costs far more damage to its reputation than what little benefit it could ever possibly bring.

    It’s worse than a waste of oil and metal, it’s greatly damaging Japan.

    All for the sake a few old men’s pride.

  • John Doe

    Why doesn´t this article mention how Japanese whalers tried refuelling in an area where it is forbidden to refuel? Why doesn´t it mention it is illegal to kill whales in Australian territorial waters?

    • ddpalmer

      Why don’t you provide some proof that they tried to refuel in an area where it is forbidden to refuel?

      And why mention what is illegal in Australian territorial waters when the actions aren’t taking place in Australian territorial waters?

      • Truth

        Mr Palmer, an honest question please.

        Why, as a foreigner, do you have any interest at all about what is really just a Japanese internal issue? What motivated you to become involved in defending the Japanese whaling industry?

        Yes, I see how many of your criticisms of Sea Shepherd are fair, but then many of your defences are equally obscure as the kind of construction Sea Shepherd create, e.g. your concern for the welfare of cows.

        I can understand why, for dolphin and whale lovers, there is a motivation to wish to stop their suffering but why would you be motivated to want them to continue to suffer? Or to support a foreign industry which only survives on government handouts.

        Thank you

        • ddpalmer

          Well let me ask you. Why don’t you question the interest of the Sea Shepherds? They aren’t Japanese and yet they are interested in what is really just a Japanese internal issue?

          Maybe you see it as a Japanese internal issue but are the Faeroe Islands Japanese? How about Norway and Iceland? What about Namibia and Malta? Then there are Canada and Costa Rica? So no it is a world wide issue. And I feel that everyone who travels by or makes a living on the sea should be interested in the issue of the Sea Shepherds violations of the UN CLOS. Because if they are seen to get away with there clear violations it may embolden others to follow suit.

          I guess you don’t understand my pointing out the hypocrisy of many Sea Shepherd supporters who are against whaling but don’t see a problem with factory farming or fishing.

          “…why would you be motivated to want them to continue to suffer?” And that statement just shows that you are a part of the problem and view the world with a huge set of blinders on. You seem to believe that if someone doesn’t actively oppose whaling then they actively support all aspects of whaling. Isn’t it possible that someone could not like whaling but still support the rule of law that allows whaling to continue? And thus be opposed to those that break the law in an attempt to stop whaling? I can be opposed to the KKK but still support their right to exist and to say just about whatever they want.

          • Truth

            Your answer isn’t clear at all but you seem to be saying that you are not really interested in the interests of the Japanese whalers at all.

            Are you inferring that you are a mariner who is just concerned with the extension of the rule of law at sea in general?

            Or are you just an Authoritarian Personality type extending their interest to maritime law related issues?

            Why can’t you just answer a simple, direct question with a simple, direct answer? Presumably it isn’t your job to police Sea Shepherd and so I wondered why, of all the things being done wrong in this world, it was specifically them that riled you up?

            Sea Shepherd and their supporters are, I understand, interested in maritime conservation therefore they are not, and perhaps can legally as an NPO, be interested in pigs, cows and kangaroos. I found that argument a little misleading.

            What is “blind” to state the obvious that the whales suffer terribly? Are you suggesting that ignore that suffering is to “opening my eyes”?

            Are you saying that whales don’t feel pain?

          • ddpalmer

            What I am saying is that you are obviously a troll who tries hard to appear as unbiased. And I see no reason to answer any further questions from an anonymous troll who ignores questions he is asked and goes to great lengths to twist others plain words to seem like they said something they never said.

          • Truth

            I read on another forum that you are semi-retired on a military pension and have part-time work.

            It amazed me to discover that for several years (3 or more) you have spent your time on the ecologist’s websites defending the floating slaughterhouse from Japan. A sinking industry that probably only employs a few dozen people and survives on government handouts.

            It’s irrational. Even you care about employment issues there are far more important and vulnerable industries in Japan you could care about, like all the day workers, those on non-regular contracts, or the clean-up men at Fukushima.

            Ignore questions? I answered you. Sea Shepherd people are whale lovers, they want to stop as much whale suffering if they can. The whales aren’t Japanese. The whalers leave Japanese waters to slaughter them.

            Now you answer my question.

            Of all the causes in the world, why do you want to fight for a slaughterhouse run on government handouts?

          • ddpalmer

            I don;t care what lies you claim to have read on another forum.

            He is a hint for you. When you become my boss you can give me orders.

            And you didn’t answer my questions. You maybe touch on but never stated an answer to one of my question while accusing me of something I clearly never said or implied and then ignored the rest of my post. Your classic posting style and classic posting style of a troll.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=621421000 Ross Goodine

    I am disappointed the Japanese people continue to harvest whales and dolphins.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=621421000 Ross Goodine

    I am disappointed the Japanese people continue to support the killing of whales and dolphins.