TEPCO gives itself a clean chit for how it handled last year’s nuclear crisis

TEPCO gives itself a clean chit for how it handled last year’s nuclear crisis

No matter who claims how well they coped with the nuclear disaster that struck Fukushima, the bottom line is that more than 100,000 have been displaced from their homes and a vast area has been left uninhabitable for decades to come. Food resources surrounding the TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plan is contaminated, so the report by TEPCO claiming that it did not hide any information and did its best to cope with the 9.0 quake, doesn’t absolve itself from the responsibility of the tragedy.

TEPCO under the helm of executive vice president Masao Yamazaki conducted an in-house investigation, overseen by a third-party panel of experts, to determine if it had take all the right steps and measures to avert the nuclear reactor meltdown, given the extreme conditions imposed by the earthquake and the subsequent tsunami. TEPCO has been accused of concealing information and underplaying the extent of damage. This report claims that the government’s interference in the disaster response created confusion and delays.

TEPCO still maintains that no company could have predicted or been prepared for the eventualities of such a huge earthquake. According to the details that have surfaced through other sources, the company had an idea of how vulnerable the reactors were, should a disaster of this magnitude strike. It worked closely with regulators and nuclear experts to ‘hijack nuclear policy’ and has been doing its best to avoid close scrutiny of the damaged plant. One other critical point that the report tries to clarify is did TEPCO propose abandoning the operations during the peak of the crisis? According to a testimony by former prime minister Naoto Kan, he did receive such a request, but his office overrode it. I guess this sums it up for us! So much so for sorry excuses and clarification reports.

Share Button
DISCUSS IT
Comment Policy : Our comments section is open and welcome to anyone who wishes to participate in discussion or share their point of view, regardless of what it may be. In order to limit spam and those who wish to impede meaningful conversation, we are now requiring users to log in with an account or verify their email address. However, the following behavior will result in your comment being deleted or, if continued, permanent removal from conversations: posting under multiple names, making hateful/racist comments, or making no valuable contribution by posting the same thing repeatedly.
  • AnidesAntrobus

    A hack job on TEPCO. Thanks a lot JDP. Looks like an editorial to me.

    I think anyone who knows how the world works would know that “somebody somewhere thinks there might be a problem if a 9.0 earthquake hits” and “sinking billions of dollars into a 40 meter high seawall” are two different things.

    After an event like this, there is going to be fingerpointing, but I don’t see how painting these people as evil can possibly be accurate. We can’t reasonably expect these things to happen every 1000 years, and if we could, would preparing for such rare events even make sense?

    As it stands, there is property damage. Apparently no ill effects from radiation. Evacuation was orderly, causing no casualties. Compared to what happened up the coast, this wasn’t so bad.

    Yesterday, a meteorite hit Russia. If the meteorite had hit Fukushima Daiichi, I can bet that Radhika would be blustering and spitting that we should have predicted that too.