Transgender Japanese citizen denied fatherly rights by court

Transgender Japanese citizen denied fatherly rights by court

A Japanese transgender female to male parent was seeking to have his son listed in the family registry only to be rejected by the Tokyo Family Court. The plaintiff’s wife gave birth to the son, via donated sperm when the couple lived in Shiso, Hyogo Prefecture.

The couple married in 2008, after the husband officially changed his gender, and were recognized as husband and wife under a new law that came into effect in 2004. The court’s ruling on Wednesday was the nation’s first involving a family register of a child born from parents with one of them having gender identity disorder (GID). Regarding Wednesday’s ruling, Judge Yoshiki Matsutani said not recognizing the husband as the father was not a violation of the Constitution that states “all of the people are equal under the law and there shall be no discrimination in political, economic or social relations because of race, creed, sex, social status or family origin.” According to the Civil Code, a child born by a woman during marriage shall be presumed to be the husband’s child. The judge argued that the boy cannot be the plaintiff’s son because it was objectively clear from the family registry that the husband was unable to produce sperm and therefore cannot be the father. The judge also ruled that the decision to leave the father’s name blank in the family registry did not violate the law on special cases involving people with GID.

Despite all the legal stress, the father will continue to fight for recognition. Since he is registered as a male and Japan recognizes him as such, the plaintiff should receive fair treatment as a father. The plaintiff said “I feel I am being discriminated against. I will continue to fight so that I can live as a husband and a father.”

[via AFP]
Share Button
DISCUSS IT
Comment Policy : Our comments section is open and welcome to anyone who wishes to participate in discussion or share their point of view, regardless of what it may be. In order to limit spam and those who wish to impede meaningful conversation, we are now requiring users to log in with an account or verify their email address. However, the following behavior will result in your comment being deleted or, if continued, permanent removal from conversations: posting under multiple names, making hateful/racist comments, or making no valuable contribution by posting the same thing repeatedly.
  • Denise Holliday

    Assuming a person born male but impotent would be granted fatherly identy, then this person should also be granted the same privelage. Please reconsider and be fair to this man.

  • sengleong

    It seems that Judge Yoshiki Matsutani had taken the medical line strictly in passing down his judgement. In doing so he may have contradicted the Civil Code that a child born by a woman during marriage shall be presumed to be the husband’s child. This couple was married in 2008 and the husband changed his gender and was recognized by the new law passed in 2004.
    There could be a possibility of discrimination here. It would be interesting if legal professional would take up this case and test the Judge Yoshiki Matsutan’s verdict.

  • http://twitter.com/spasskultur spasskultur

    ” be fair to this man.”

    this person is not a man and will never be.