UN to study validity of China’s scientific claim over islands

UN to study validity of China’s scientific claim over islands

Despite Japan’s protestations that they should not be involved, the United Nations will be studying the validity of China‘s scientific claims over a disputed group of islands in the East China Sea. Both Japan and China, as well as Taiwan are claiming sovereignty over the uninhabited islands.

Called Senkaku (Japan), Diaoyu (China) and Tiaoyutai (Taiwan), the islands are being claimed by the three countries probably due to its location near rich fishing grounds, as well as its potential gas and oil reserves. In a report submitted by China to the UN Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf, they claim that the islands are part of the continental shelf in the East China Sea which is just a natural prolongation of China’s land territory. It says that the “Diaoyu Dao upfold zone” is between the East China Sea shelf basin and the Okinawa Trough and the Trough is the termination of its continental shelf.

Under the UN convention, a country can extend its 200-nautical-mile economic zone if they can prove that the continental shelf is a natural extension of its land mass. But the UN only assesses the scientific validity and any disputes have to be settled between states. They are including China’s claim in the provisional agenda of a meeting set from July 15 to Aug 30 in New York.

Japan has written a letter to the UN mission saying that based on historical facts and international law, the Senkakus are “an inherent part of the territory of Japan”. China responded by saying that Japan’s claims are “illegal and invalid.” Tensions between the two countries are increasing, despite calls by the United States through Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, to let “cool heads” prevail. Japanese military planes have scrambled against Chinese planes flying closely through airspace over the islands while patrol vessels from both countries are playing cat-and-mouse in the waters of the disputed islands.

[via Straits Times]
Share Button
DISCUSS IT
Comment Policy : Our comments section is open and welcome to anyone who wishes to participate in discussion or share their point of view, regardless of what it may be. In order to limit spam and those who wish to impede meaningful conversation, we are now requiring users to log in with an account or verify their email address. However, the following behavior will result in your comment being deleted or, if continued, permanent removal from conversations: posting under multiple names, making hateful/racist comments, or making no valuable contribution by posting the same thing repeatedly.
  • Adoring Fan

    Well china refused to go to court with japan even though japan has suggested. Japan has the evidence. China doesnt. Dear china, senkakus dont belong to you….

    We just need the UN investigation to correctly work out that japan owns the islands. And btw korea, u want to name Sea Of Japan as East Sea? ok! East sea of China <3

    • Taiwanese

      Please quote that Japan suggests that the dispute should go to court. or you are lying.

      • chinaman

        How many articles have you been reading last year in reg the Senkaku? CN is clear back off when JP verbally proposed to sort the issue out by ICJ.

  • Taiwanese

    As far as I know, Japan wants to bring South Korea to court but It was refused by SK. For Diaoyu, Japan’s position is there is no dispute. Diaoyu belongs to Okinawa and Japan owns Okinawa. That’s it!

    • Banlas

      Taiwanenese are cowards la. Sodomized by the Japanese until it has no courage even to fight for their own islands.

      • Whirled Peas

        Please invoke your higher self and refrain from these inflammatory and vulgar remarks. They don’t shed any light to the discussion, Thank you!

  • pete

    Money works in Chinese court. Does money work in UN? It’s possible, some people likes money more than anything else.

  • shanghainoon

    “… if they can prove that the continental shelf is a natural extension of its land mass…” in reality this rule can’t overwrite the current administrative of the islands or territories of a country. In fact, the border is just an imagination line that is accepted by all parties involved. Falklland island, Haiwai… and many more are clearly thousand miles away from the countries that administrative those.

    Perhaps China must consider its righteous when claiming Spratly islands which clearly thousand miles away, I don’t believe it would fall into the “natural extension”, from the most southern part of China, Hainam. The Spratly is much closer to Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia.